Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Update on numbers

This year's fire season is turning out to be very busy and active. We had a fairly slow start (although I did map my first fire on Valentine's Day), but the fires have made up for that now. I've been mapping fires in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Northern California recently. Some numbers are shown below:



In the number of fires supported, I've now surpassed 2001, 2003, 2004, and 2005. In the number of acres mapped, I've now surpassed 2001, 2004, and 2005. The thing about 2002 and 2003 are a few large fires severely inflated the acreage: 2002 saw Rodeo-Chediski (500,000 acres), Biscuit (500,000 acres), McNally (150,000) and Hayman (140,000). 2003 had Southern California that burned 750,000 acres during the end of October and early November. The crazy thing is that it takes just as much energy and effort to map a 100,000-acre fire as it does a 5,000-acre fire. So I feel like I've been very busy this year.

2 comments:

Papa Doc said...

So what was the big deal in 2002?
Dad clark

Jess and Jen said...

Ignitions at just the right time, with favorable (for fire) weather conditions persisting for weeks. That, mixed with huge fuel loadings in the National Forests, created a perfect storm.

The Hayman and Rodeo-Chediski Fires were intentionally started by humans. Jerks.